Group C

Peace along the Missouri/Kansas border

with 5 comments

John Brown at the center of “Bleeding Kansas”

This painting , Tragic Prelude, by John Steuart Curry is from the Kansas state capitol.

After our last discussion in class, (and because I sadly could not find enough information on black Confederate soldiers), I decided to blog about the tensions between people in Missouri and Kansas. On the “MO/KS Border War Network” website [1] I found a podcast given by Deb Barker in March of this year. Barker is the executive director of a historical society in Kansas, and is also the curator of the Old Depot Museum in Ottawa, Kansas.

In this discussion, Barker highlights the lives of two men who felt differently about political matters, but were able to live peaceably within their counties. As Jeremy Neely argued in the chapter excerpt that we read of The Border Between Them:  Violence and Reconciliation on the Kansas-Missouri Line, neighbors who took opposing political stands did not often get along—to put it lightly.

Dr. Joseph Cusick lived in Peoria, Kansas, Franklin County respectively. He was strongly pro-slavery. In July of 1860, Peoria was holding its annual Fourth of July celebration. Dr. Cusick was in attendance. At these celebrations, which occurred across the territory, (Kansas was not a state yet), cannons were fired, a rousing speech was orated and the Declaration of Independence was usually read. That year in Peoria a noted attorney, Daniel Valentine, was asked to make a speech. During this speech, in which he mentioned slavery in a negative light, Valentine recorded that Dr. Cusick could not even listen, mounted his horse and left the celebration. A former resident of Cass County, Dr. Cusick had been a slave owner but was regarded by Judge Valentine, and the citizens of Peoria, as an upstanding man.

At the same time, another pro-slaver by the name of Joab Bernard was not silent about his political views. Bernard lived essentially by himself in St. Bernard County, what Barker refers to as a, “one house town,” with the house being Joab Bernard’s. He was a trader whose store in Westport had been destroyed by anti-slavery men affiliated with the abolitionist John Brown. Even after this unrest, Bernard chose to stay for over ten years and was an active member of the Westport community; his uncle was also the mayor of Westport, Missouri. Barker states how remarkable it is that Bernard could live among free-staters and be outspokenly for slavery. In fact, a nearby town held a meeting to determine whether or not they would be anti- or pro-slavery. Bernard was the single vote for pro-slavery, but simply went about his business as usual after being overruled. Being the only voice in his home county of St. Bernard no doubt helped to appease him.

The lives of these men are significant when you consider the violent upheaval that was present during their time. These men had lived through Bleeding Kansas, they had witnessed the unrest. Yet somehow the towns that they were a part of agreed to live in peace with them. Dr. Cusick was not hiding his pro-slavery views when he publicly left the town Fourth of July gathering. That was an open and clear view of his sentiments. Similarly, Joab Bernard voted in plain sight for a slave county. Both of these are bold moves. Perhaps they felt so strongly about the issue of slavery that it gave them the courage to make, what could be viewed as, foolish stands. Or perhaps by this time, both sides were mutually tired of civil discontent, although that being the case, the border violence would have ceased before the Civil War began making the Missouri/Kansas conflict lose some of its significance. In any case, this podcast revealed valuable information concerning the border tensions, and welcome news of peaceable neighbors.


Written by ajanelseman

November 3, 2010 at 12:19 am

Posted in Uncategorized

5 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. I really found this blog interesting. It is interesting to find out that there were people who could live together and essentially respect what another man viewed, even if it was opposite of what another man viewed. Obviously they were not shy about how they felt, however, they were respected because of how they handled their business. If either of them would have started bashing the other side or something similar they might not have been viewed very highly. They were viewed by how they acted and it sounded to me like they treated everyone with respect but had their own opinion about slavery. That is something some people need to learn today. I have my own political views and I know others have different ones. It is not my place to say that others are wrong in what they believe, and I expect the same in return. If this world could just get that things would run a lot smoother. But instead something always has to bash the other guy because they don’t believe the same thing. Good job!

    karinpruett

    November 4, 2010 at 2:09 pm

  2. This was a very good post. It is pretty strange that people could live in harmony that share very different views especially on the subject of slavery. This was such touchy subject, with people for it and against it that I thought it would be impossible to live together without violence if the views about the subject are different. Maybe it is like you said, they were just tired of the subject altogether and just decided to live with it because they did not want to fight anymore. whatever the case may be they were able to live in harmony. This was a good post.

    znunez

    November 5, 2010 at 10:25 am

  3. I love this. In light of the elections we just witnessed, isn’t it amazing that people can recognize differences and live with them. Isn’t that what diversity is about? A person can stand up for what they believe in without bashing the other person who believes the opposite. Look at the horrid events that happened in this region, and for people to be civil afterwards…wow, what great ethics! We could all learn from this. Thank you

    Amanda Mayo

    November 5, 2010 at 2:55 pm

  4. You wrote a blog about peace within Missouri-Kansas territories while I wrote a blog about the violence during the “Bleeding Kansas” ! Very interesting to see that,even during periods of great trouble and hatred, there were intelligent people able to live in peace with others not having the same opinion at all about a burning question such as slavery. I listened to the beginning of the link you put, and even though I could not catch everything, it looked really pleasing. I admire such people who are able to live among others without hiding their stance and able to respect the others’ viewpoint, especially in a violent context in Kansas. In my blog, I highlight the violence of the Marais des Cygnes Massacre and the schock it was by integrating an excerpt of a famous poem. The difference between your blog and mine is striking.

    Aurélie5747

    November 6, 2010 at 1:52 pm

  5. I found this to be very interesting painting, the way the artist painted his version of the events that happened on the border and you can see his passion in the painting. The poster did a good job of breaking down the painting and giving us their insite. I like this blog because I had posted on Brown myself and so I had a great appritiation for the painting.

    cm.trujillo

    November 12, 2010 at 3:38 pm


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: